DID PORZINGIS DESERVE THAT EJECTION? MAVERICKS at CLIPPERS | Full Game Highlights | August 17, 2020
DID PORZINGIS DESERVE THAT EJECTION? MAVERICKS at CLIPPERS | Full Game Highlights | August 17, 2020
The LA Clippers defeated the Dallas Mavericks, 118-110, in Game 1. Kawhi Leonard recorded 29 PTS, 12 REB and 6 AST for the Clippers, while Paul George added 27 PTS in the victory. Luka Doncic tallied an NBA playoff debut record 42 PTS, along with 7 REB and 9 AST. The Clippers lead this best-of-seven series, 1-0.
Watch More Videos:
Make The Shot, I'll Buy You Anything: https://youtu.be/qtBa3Wv37xw
Crazy Game of Basketball Dodgeball: https://youtu.be/DkOIz8asAfo
Instagram: @rayrrodriguez_
Twitter: @rayrrodriguez_
Beats by:
Nocturn: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9Mf7_YXe83CsYBVwKf3m6Q
Did Kristaps Porzingis deserved to be ejected? Today, we discuss whether or not the Kristaps Porzingis ejection was justified. In my opinion, the answer to that question is no. First of all, the first technical was a terrible reason for a technical foul as Kristaps Porzingis was only expressing his natural frustration due to his disagreement with the call. Second of all, for the second technical, Porzingis was trying to break up a scuffle that could have potentially became something worse. The final reason has to do with the fact that this is the NBA playoffs. The fans don't want to see NBA stars getting ejected over petty reasons. One can make the argument that this ejection altered the outcome of the game as the Dallas Mavericks were leading the LA Clippers at the time of Porzingis' ejection and he, as well as Luka Doncic and the rest of the Mavericks, were playing a great game.
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS*
DID PORZINGIS DESERVE THAT EJECTION? MAVERICKS at CLIPPERS | Full Game Highlights | August 17, 2020
The LA Clippers defeated the Dallas Mavericks, 118-110, in Game 1. Kawhi Leonard recorded 29 PTS, 12 REB and 6 AST for the Clippers, while Paul George added 27 PTS in the victory. Luka Doncic tallied an NBA playoff debut record 42 PTS, along with 7 REB and 9 AST. The Clippers lead this best-of-seven series, 1-0.
Watch More Videos:
Make The Shot, I’ll Buy You Anything: https://youtu.be/qtBa3Wv37xw
Crazy Game of Basketball Dodgeball: https://youtu.be/DkOIz8asAfo
Instagram: @rayrrodriguez_
Twitter: @rayrrodriguez_
Beats by:
Nocturn: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9Mf7_YXe83CsYBVwKf3m6Q
Did Kristaps Porzingis deserved to be ejected? Today, we discuss whether or not the Kristaps Porzingis ejection was justified. In my opinion, the answer to that question is no. First of all, the first technical was a terrible reason for a technical foul as Kristaps Porzingis was only expressing his natural frustration due to his disagreement with the call. Second of all, for the second technical, Porzingis was trying to break up a scuffle that could have potentially became something worse. The final reason has to do with the fact that this is the NBA playoffs. The fans don’t want to see NBA stars getting ejected over petty reasons. One can make the argument that this ejection altered the outcome of the game as the Dallas Mavericks were leading the LA Clippers at the time of Porzingis’ ejection and he, as well as Luka Doncic and the rest of the Mavericks, were playing a great game.
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS*
